Agri-food leaders see opportunities and challenges in proposed National Planning Policy Framework revisions.
Lincolnshire’s agri-food leaders met to discuss the Government’s proposed changes to the National Planning Policy Framework at the latest meeting of the Greater Lincolnshire Forum for Agriculture and Horticulture.
With farmers looking to diversify their businesses in bids to become profitable, more and more are coming unstuck when looking into development with national planning policies that require external consultants, reports, surveys and licenses.
As Matt Riddington, chairman of the Greater Lincolnshire Forum for Agriculture and Horticulture, explains: “At the moment, planning can be overly complex, slow and risky.
“Farmers can spend years and hundreds of thousands of pounds in the planning process for developments on their land, facing numerous delays and appeals, only for it to be rejected. That’s creating a real bottleneck on growth and development in rural communities.”
Trina Britton, of Thetford Farm Estate, was one of those facing delays to development and highlighted the issue of individuals and small pressure groups being able to slow the planning process down, saying:
“As it stands, a handful of objectors can hold up planning applications for months or even years, using appeals and repeated information requests to prolong the process. Delays are often made worse with additional discharge of conditions, inconsistent interpretation of changes to planning rules, and even staff shortages, all of which add significant time and costs to developments.
“In our case, these delays held up our project by 18 months, which in turn delayed job creation and economic benefits to the wider rural economy and supply chain.
“These delays also disproportionately hurt small and family farms, which may not be able to afford the increased costs or consultants required to deal with the delays and requests, and it unnecessarily adds stress and uncertainty to development.
“This isn’t about ignoring objections, but when it really is one or two people holding things up for years, there’s clearly a need to reassess where that balance is struck.
The uncertainty around how long applications will take, or what they will ultimately cost, is already causing some farms to avoid development altogether, which is not a sign of a planning system that’s working effectively. A more farmer-friendly system is needed, and if done right, it could unlock a lot of growth across the rural economy.”
Another specific challenge, presented by farmers in the Wolds, was the regulations around development in protected landscapes.
William Price, of Harrington Hall Farms, commented: “Farms and businesses in National Landscapes, what were Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty, have extra processes and hoops to jump through when applying for even the simplest of developments.
“We appreciate that these are protected areas, but some family farms in these areas were established before these designations came into place, and we’ve coexisted with the landscape for hundreds of years, helping to protect and preserve its unique character.
“At the same time we’re being asked to diversify to remain profitable, farms in these areas are being prevented from doing so under the current policies. Some successful farms are starting to run at losses, and it’s not right that because of where we’re located, we’re being squeezed out of making a profit.”
It was recognised that Lincolnshire’s local planners and decision-makers do typically understand agricultural needs, how they form part of the wider supply chain, and do what they can to support the sector, but the national framework doesn’t align well with rural realities.
Discussions highlighted the need to allow these local decision-makers to make local decisions, with work to establish a better balance between national policies and local decision-making a priority, but also advising against a one-size-fits-all approach.
Matt added: “Even between seemingly similar counties like Lincolnshire and Norfolk, there are substantial differences. So, it is clear that a blanket policy will not work, and this is where devolved decision-making would allow more appropriate trade-offs.
“We also need more recognition from the Government that our market towns and villages aren’t just dormitories for people who work in the big towns and cities.
“The continued push for the centralisation of services is really hurting some of our communities. We have the local talent and entrepreneurship to thrive. What we need is support from the planning framework that ensures rural areas get the housing, services, skills and infrastructure needed to retain and grow that talent here in Lincolnshire.
“The proposed revisions to the NPFF do go some way to address these issues, and there’s definitely some positive signs. We’re cautiously optimistic that it’s a step in the right direction for the sector, but we need to start seeing the finer details.
“The investment is out there, we just need a planning system that actively encourages it and looks to end the bottleneck on growth.
Following the meeting, the Greater Lincolnshire Forum for Agriculture and Horticulture is working to finalise a formal response to the Government’s consultation on the National Planning Policy Framework, representing the views of forum members.
Find out more about the proposed changes to the National Planning Policy Framework and planning system on the Government’s website.
Sign up for GLFFAH’s newsletter to keep up to date with the latest news and updates from the forum and the ongoing support available for Lincolnshire’s agricultural and horticultural communities.
The Greater Lincolnshire Forum for Agriculture and Horticulture meets four times a year and is comprised of a diverse range of members with representatives from farms of all sizes, sector bodies, training organisations and support services. Its operations are supported by officers from Lincolnshire County Council.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.